How Much Can We Weaken Downward Entailment?
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper discusses the occurrence of certain polarity items (PIs) in the complements of factive verbs and only, which are not downward entailing (DE). Two solutions in the direction of weakening classical monotonicity are discussed: Strawson DE, von Fintel 1999; and weak DE, Hoeksema 1986. Both rely on the idea that monotonicity is computed only after the inference to the subset is made part of the background knowledge. We see that this weakening systematically either overgeneralizes or undergeneralizes, in either case failing to characterize the correct set of licensers. It is proposed that a more promising account must rely on the notion of nonveridicality (Giannakidou 1998, 1999), augmented with the premise that certain PIs, i.e. the liberal class represented by any, are subject to a weaker polarity dependency identified as anti-licensing by veridicality. 1 The problem and the suggested remedies The main observation, which goes back to Linebarger 1980 (see also Atlas 1993, 1996, Horn 1996, to appear, Giannakidou 1998, von Fintel 1999) is that polarity items (PIs) like any and English minimizers occur in the scope of only, and in the complements of negative factive verbs: (1) a Only Larry ate anything. b Only Larry slept a wink. (2) a Larry regrets that he said {anything/a word}. b * Larry is glad that he said {anything/a word}. The fact in (1) as well as the grammaticality of (2a) and its contrast with (2b) do not follow from Ladusaw’s classical thesis that PIs are licensed in the scope of expressions that denote downward entailing functions: (3) Ladusaw’s (1979) licensing condition α is a trigger for NPIs in its scope iff α is downward entailing. (4) Downward entailing function A function f is downward entailing iff for every arbitrary element X,Y such that X⊆Y: f(Y) → f(X).
منابع مشابه
Don't 'Have a Clue'? Unsupervised Co-Learning of Downward-Entailing Operators
Researchers in textual entailment have begun to consider inferences involving downward-entailing operators, an interesting and important class of lexical items that change the way inferences are made. Recent work proposed a method for learning English downward-entailing operators that requires access to a high-quality collection of negative polarity items (NPIs). However, English is one of the ...
متن کاملChildren’s Knowledge of Disjunction and Universal Quantification in Mandarin Chinese
Downward entailing linguistic environments license inferences from sets to their subsets. These environments also determine the interpretation of disjunction: Disjunction licenses a conjunctive entailment in the scope of downward entailing operators (Crain 2008, 2012). This leads to a striking asymmetry across languages in the interpretation of disjunction when it appears in the restrictor (dow...
متن کاملHow Much Can We Save the Cost from Shifting from Single - Test Strip to Multiple - Test Strip in Point of Care Testing Analysis for Common Clinical Chemistry Parameters ?
متن کامل
Methods for Using Textual Entailment in Open-Domain Question Answering
Work on the semantics of questions has argued that the relation between a question and its answer(s) can be cast in terms of logical entailment. In this paper, we demonstrate how computational systems designed to recognize textual entailment can be used to enhance the accuracy of current open-domain automatic question answering (Q/A) systems. In our experiments, we show that when textual entail...
متن کاملDefinition And Analysis Of Intermediate Entailment Levels
In this paper we define two intermediate models of textual entailment, which correspond to lexical and lexical-syntactic levels of representation. We manually annotated a sample from the RTE dataset according to each model, compared the outcome for the two models, and explored how well they approximate the notion of entailment. We show that the lexicalsyntactic model outperforms the lexical mod...
متن کامل